Biography of Pedro Alonso Lopez, Monster of the Andes

Pedro Alonzo Lopez (born October 8, 1948) was responsible for the murders of over 350 children, yet in 1998 he was set free despite his vows to kill again. Rumors regarding his whereabouts have swirled since the late 1990s. Fast Facts: Pedro Alonzo Lopez Known For: Serial killer, responsible for the brutal murders of over 350 childrenAlso Known As: Monster of the AndesBorn: October 8, 1948Parents: Midardo Reyes, Benilda Là ³pez De CastenedaNotable Quote: They Never Scream. They Expect Nothing. They Are Innocent. Early Years Lopez was born on October 8, 1948, in Tolima, Colombia, a time when the country was in political turmoil and crime was rampant. He was the seventh of 13 children born to a Colombian prostitute. When Lopez was eight, his mother caught him touching his sisters breast, and she kicked him out of the house forever. Trust Me, Trust Me Not Lopez became a beggar on the violent Colombian streets. He was soon approached by a man who sympathized with the boys situation and offered him a safe home and food to eat. Lopez, desperate and hungry, did not hesitate and went with the man. Instead of going to a comfortable home, he was taken to an abandoned building and repeatedly sodomized and returned to the street. During the attack, Lopez angrily vowed he would do the same to as many little girls that he could, a promise he later kept. After being raped by the pedophile, Lopez became paranoid of strangers, hiding during the day and scavenging for food at night. Within a year he left  Tolima  and wandered to the town of Bogota. An American couple reached out to him after feeling pity for the thin boy begging for food. They brought him to their home and enrolled him in a school for orphans, but when he was 12, a male teacher molested him. Shortly afterward, Lopez stole money and fled back into the streets. Prison Life Lopez, lacking in education and skill, survived on the streets by begging and committing petty thievery. His stealing advanced to car theft, and he was paid well when he sold the stolen cars to chop shops. He was arrested at the age of 18 for car theft and sent to prison. After a few days of being there, he was gang-raped by four prisoners. The anger and rage he experienced as a child rose inside him again, consuming him. He made another vow to himself; to never be violated again. Lopez got his revenge for the rape by killing three of the four men responsible. Authorities added two years to his sentence, deeming his actions as self-defense. During his incarceration, he had time to revisit his life, and a quiet rage toward his mother became monstrous. He also dealt with his sexual needs by browsing pornographic magazines. Between his prostitute mother and the pornography, Lopezs only knowledge of women fed his demented hatred for them. Release and Rearrest In 1978, Lopez was released from prison, moved to Peru, and began kidnapping and killing young Peruvian girls. He was caught by a group of Indians and tortured, buried up to his neck in the sand, but was later freed and deported to Ecuador. Experiencing near death did not influence his murderous ways and his killing of young girls continued. The increase of missing girls was noticed by authorities, but it was concluded that they had likely been kidnapped by child peddlers and sold as sex slaves. In April 1980, a flood exposed the bodies of four murdered children, and the Ecuadorian authorities realized there was a serial murderer at large. Shortly after the flood, Lopez was caught trying to abduct a young girl after the child’s mother intervened. The police could not get Lopez to cooperate, so they enlisted the help of a local priest, dressed him as a prisoner, and placed him in a cell with Lopez. The trick worked. Lopez was quick to share his brutal crimes with his new cellmate. Lopez Confesses When confronted by the police about the crimes he shared with his cellmate, Lopez broke down and confessed. His memory of his crimes was very clear, which was remarkable since he confessed to killing at least 110 children in Ecuador, more than 100 more in Colombia, and another 100 in Peru. Lopez admitted that he would walk the streets looking for innocent girls who he would lure away with the promise of gifts. Lopez often brought the girls to prepared graves, sometimes filled with the dead bodies of other girls he had killed. He would calm the child with soft reassuring words throughout the night. At sunrise he would rape and strangle them, satisfying his sick sexual needs as he watched their eyes fade as they died. He never killed at night because he could not see his victims eyes and felt, without that element, the murder was a waste. In Lopezs confession, he told of having tea parties and playing morbid games with the deceased children. He would prop them up in their graves and talk to them, convincing himself that his little friends liked the company. But when the dead children failed to answer, he would become bored and go off to find another victim. Monster of the Andes The police found his ghastly confession hard to believe, so Lopez agreed to take them to the graves of the children. More than 53 bodies were found, which was enough for the investigators to take him at his word. The public renamed him Monster of the Andes as more information about his crimes became known. For his crimes of raping, killing, and mutilating over 100 children, Lopez received a sentence of life in prison. Lopez never showed remorse for his crimes. In a prison interview with journalist Ron Laytner, he said if he ever got out of prison he would happily return to killing young children. The pleasure he received from his demented acts of murder overpowered any sense of right from wrong, and he admittedly looked forward to the opportunity to wrap his hands around the throat of his next child. Second Release No one was concerned that Lopez would have the opportunity to kill again. If paroled from the prison in Ecuador, he would still have to stand trial for his murders in Colombia and Peru. But after 20 years of solitary confinement, in the summer of 1998, it is said that Lopez was taken in the middle of the night to the Colombia border and released. Neither Colombia or Peru had the money to bring the madman to justice. Whereabouts Unknown Whatever happened to The Monster of the Andes is unknown. Many suspect and hope that one of the many bounties offered for his death eventually paid off and that he is dead. If Lopez has escaped his enemies and is still alive, there is little doubt that he has returned to his old ways. Sources Pearson, Nick. â€Å"Worlds Second Worst Serial Killer Walked Free from Prison.†Ã‚  9News Breaking News, 9News, 5 Dec. 2018.Serena, Katie. â€Å"Serial Killer Who Murdered 300 People Was Released From Jail, And No One Knows Where He Is.†Ã‚  All Thats Interesting, 30 Nov. 2018.â€Å"The Monster Of The Andes: South American Serial Killer Pedro Lopez.†Ã‚  Did You Know?, 17 July 2017.

Effects Of Drugs And Alcohol During Pregnancy - 2451 Words

The Effects of Drugs and Alcohol During Pregnancy Final Research Proposal Latifah Kelly Tuskegee University Abstract: Becoming a mother can be a rather challenging time for many parents, especially new parents. This experiment will educate women who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant on the risks of their behaviors dealing with drugs and alcohol throughout their pregnancy. The purpose of this experiment is to show how often these horrible things happen to unborn children and the effects that drugs and alcohol have on children throughout the first few years of their life and throughout the course of their life, for some children. This experiment is also happening to try and prevent children from having these types of birth defects due to the lack of knowledge that parents have on the cons of abusing drugs and alcohol during the course of a pregnancy. Introduction: When you are pregnant, every single thing that you eat, drink or take into your body will not only affect you but it will also affect your child. Many women tend to change their diet and exercise routines when they become pregnant. The most important thing is to avoid drug abuse and also avoid alcohol abuse. Many women are not as careful as they should be when they become pregnant. Seeing as many people are not aware of the effect that drugs have on the unborn children of pregnant women, those of us who know of the danger should spread awareness about it. Using drugs duringShow MoreRelatedWhy Pregnant Substance Abuse Should Be Treated As A Major Issue1441 Words   |  6 Pagessubstance abuse should be treated as a major issue. The effects of substance abuse on the mother, fetus, and the overall pregnancy can range from none to extremely harmful. Women who use drugs during their pregnancy commonly give birth to â€Å"crack babies† or â€Å"drug babies†. Th ese babies can have developmental disabilities or other birth defects. The mother may give birth to a premature infant, underweight infant, or even have a stillborn birth. The drug use of a pregnant woman has a direct impact on theRead MorePregnant Womens Temporary Satisfaction and Long Term Consequences1500 Words   |  6 Pagescontinues to go on today is the drug and alcohol abuse by pregnant women. This has become a growing issue due to the fact that pregnancy is starting at a much younger age. Women tend to become pregnant around the age of 15 to 44 (â€Å"Birth Data†). In young women among the ages of 18 to 24, the alcohol and tobacco rates were 25.5 percent and 15.5 percent, respectively (Chen). As of 2001, about 12 percent of all pregnant women admitted to consuming alcohol during their pregnancy (Burd). Out of the 4 millionRead MoreEssay on Prenatal Substance Abuse954 Words   |  4 Pages Substance abuse during pregnancy can have a negative force on th e health and wellness of not only the fetus, but that of the mother. The harmful effects of medications, alcohol and illegal drugs on an unborn child can be devastating and can have significant consequences to its use. Sometimes the effects can be faced and treated, and other times the outcome is a lifelong challenge. During the prenatal period, it is important that new mothers are informed of the different types of abuseRead MoreA Brief Note On Drug Use On Infants1572 Words   |  7 PagesDrug Use on Newborns Many women abuse drugs whether they are pregnant or not. In both cases, many women are unaware of the consequences of what drugs can do to their body. However, for pregnant women, the situation is completely different. â€Å"Studies show that using drugs -- legal or illegal -- during pregnancy has a direct impact on the fetus† (Gaither 1). In simpler terms, drug use not only affects their own lives but also affects the lives of their unborn children. For the sake of enjoymentRead MoreHow Substance Abuse Negatively Affects The Baby While During1328 Words   |  6 PagesHow substance abuse negatively affects the baby while during a woman’s pregnancy. Many women across the world cause complications to their unborn child when they choose to abuse substance. There are many types of substance abuse such as alcohol, tobacco, and drug abuse. Most likely when women choose to engage in these types of activities it causes harm to the child and birth defects. Long term and short term deformities and conditions are present in the child. Other factors play a part into whyRead MorePregnancy and the Dangers of Drug Use1353 Words   |  6 PagesDangers of Drug Use i Pregnancy and the Dangers of Drug Use Sarah McVicker Psychology 201 Lifespan Development Professor Sally Vyain October 7, 2007 Pregnancy and the Dangers of Drug Use It is very important for a mother to lead a healthy lifestyle when she becomes pregnant. She must eat healthy, get lots of rest, and exercise regularly. It is even more imperative that she avoids things that may harm her or potentially her baby. Amongst things she must avoid, alcohol, cigarettesRead MorePrenatal Development And Development Of A Fetus1591 Words   |  7 Pagesdevelopment, also known as antenatal development, is the process of the development of a human fetus during pregnancy, from fertilization of the egg until the birth of the child. There are many factors that can contribute to the development of the fetus and many threats that can impact it. Most prenatal development occurs in a normal manner, however; there are many things that can go wrong during this vulnerable time and usually are caused by genetic or environmental factors. While the hazards thatRead MoreThe Effects Of Air Pollution On Reproductive Health1376 Words   |  6 Pagesknown as Teratogens. Teratog ens can stop the pregnancy outright, or in cases of full term pregnancies, cause birth defects to the child. Some categories of teratogens are environmental and subjective teratogens. Environmental teratogens relate to environmental factors that cause birth defects or termination of a pregnancy. Subjective teratogens are substances in which the mother consumes that cause defects to the child or also termination of a pregnancy. Substances such as air pollution, pesticidesRead MoreEssay on Teratogen Affects on Pregnancy953 Words   |  4 PagesTeratogen Affects on Pregnancy Oct 9, 2010 Textbook References: Chapter 2 Teratogens: Drugs- smoking p 50 Part II Chapter 2 Teratogens: Drugs- behavioral problem w/smoking p 51 Part II Chapter 2 Teratogens: Drugs- Child Behavioral Problems w/drinking p.52 Part II Chapter 2 Teratogens: Drugs- FAS p 51 Part II There are many potentialRead MoreFetal Alcohol Syndrome Essay1699 Words   |  7 PagesFetal Alcohol Syndrome Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) is a condition affecting children born to women who drink heavily during pregnancy. There are three criteria used to describe the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure and to make a diagnosis of FAS. The first of these is a pattern of facial anomalies, these features include: #61558; Small eye openings #61558; Flat cheekbones #61558; Flattened groove between nose and upper lip #61558; Thin upper lip These characteristics

Dow Jones V Gutnick Essay Sample free essay sample

The instance of Dow Jones A ; Company Inc V Gutnick ( 2002 ) 210 CLR 575. [ 2002 ] HCA 56 raised the legal rule of calumny and its application when committed over the cyberspace. In this case. an article published on 30 October 2000 in a hebdomadal fiscal magazine. a magazine which in bend was published by Dow Jones A ; Company Inc ( ‘Dow Jones’ ) . The article. entitled ‘Unholy Gains’ alleged that Joseph Gutnick ( ‘Gutnick’ ) was connected to a captive money launderer and revenue enhancement evader and was involved in these activities himself. The article was accompanied by a big exposure of Gutnick. The edition of the magazine sold 305. 363 transcripts and 550. 000 endorsers accessed the article online. with 1. 700 of the online endorsers utilizing an Australian recognition card to pay for the article. Gutnick brought an action against Dow Jones claiming that the article was calumniatory. The initial claim was made in Victoria. as this is wh ere the bulk of Gutnick’s societal and concern life was and where the effects of the alleged defamatory stuff would be most felt. Dow Jones refuted this claim and sought to hold the instance heard in the United States. As Freedom of Speech is a cardinal right of all United States citizens. Dow Jones were eager to take advantage of this cardinal right and hedge the right of protection of repute the Australia Courts are so eager to continue. The instance was held. ab initio. in the Supreme Court of Victoria. At the beginning of the test. Dow Jones sought to hold the proceedings stayed or for good set aside due to an evident breach of order 701 ( I ) . being that service of the claim was non appropriate as the calumny was non committed in Australia and. based on order 701 ( J ) . there was no grounds of harm suffered within the legal power. which Dow Jones believed should be where the article was published. originating from publication of the article in New Jersey. Dow Jones argued that the instance should. in fact. be heard in New Jersey as this was where the waiter was located to which the article had been uploaded and. as such. was the articles topographic point of publication. Dow Jones’ application for an order that service be stayed or for good set aside was dismissed as the test justice. Hedigan J. stated that the civil wrong occurred when contents of the publication were comprehended by the reader. which in this instance occurred in Victoria. and non where the article was published. being in New Jersey. Following this. Dow Jones appealed the determination of Hedigan J. to the Court of Appeal of Victoria. who upheld the determination of the lower tribunal. Dow Jones was so granted particular leave to take the entreaty to the High Court of Australia. An International ComparisonIn passing down their determination. Glesson CJ. McHugh. Gummow and Hayne JJ considered three issues viz. . ( 1 ) where had the stuff the Gutnick complained about been published. ( 2 ) whether the stuff had been published in Victoria and ( 3 ) whether Victoria was the appropriate legal power for the instance to be heard. From these inquiries. it is evident the issue of legal power was an of import legal inquiry that needed to be resolved. In add-on. Hedigan J. in the initial hearing. gave wider consideration to the issue of internet legal power and its application to calumny. He considered three ( 3 ) other instances on legal power. some of which are considered below. These international instances. together with the Court’s attack in the Dow Jones Case is that if a complainant can demo that the stuff. which is capable to the calumny claim. was read by at least one individual in the relevant legal power. a claim for calumny in that legal power is about automatic. Lee Teck Chee V Merrill Lynch International Bank Ltd [ 1998 ] 4 C. L. J. 188 ( Malayan High Court ) This instance involved the publication of an article in an on-line newspaper based in Singapore. The focal point of this finding was based on existent entree to the publication and this assisted the tribunal in finding whether they had legal power or non. The Court held that a publication made on a newspaper web site in Singapore could merely be considered to hold been published all around Malaysia if there was grounds that an independent party within Malaysia had accessed the publication and read it and as such the tribunal exercised legal power. Kitakufe V Oloya Ltd ( 1998 ) 67 O. T. C. 315 ( Ontario Court of Justice ) This instance involved a newspaper article published both in difficult transcript in Uganda and online. Both complainant and suspect were of African-Canadian descent. The Court held that the topographic point where the calumny occurred. and hence the subsequent legal power where any claim could be heard. refering on-line publications is. in fact. the legal power where the publication is accessible and available to be read by any 3rd party users. It was for this really ground the Court held that the Ontario Court was the appropriate legal power for the instance to be heard as this was where the most harm was suffered by the complainant. This place was reaffirmed in the Italian instance of Investors Group Inc v Hudson [ 1999 ] Recueil en Responsabilite et Assirance 185. Calder V Jones ( 1984 ) 465 US 783 This instance involved a celebrated entertainer who made a claim for calumny against the National Enquirer for an article published in Florida and circulated nationally. At the clip the article was published the complainant resided and worked in California. The tribunal determined that ‘jurisdiction may be exercised over a foreign suspect who directs his or her calumniatory message at the forum and the complainant suffers harm there’ This pre-internet instance has become the foundation for the US Courts consideration of legal power. Further consideration to the US attack to legal power will be discussed below. A affair of forum.The instance of Dow Jones raises two issues viz. . publication of stuff on the cyberspace and legal power. In Dow Jones. the two are interconnected as the finding of the topographic point of publication led to an appraisal of the appropriate legal power in which the instance should be heard. The impact the Dow Jones Case has on on-line publications is great. Whilst it is evident that the point made by Dow Jones that in order for a publishing house to hold certainty. the ‘single publication’ regulation should be adopted so that a commercial ailment can merely be brought one time in the legal power that is the topographic point of upload of a publication as ‘a defamatory statement is made available on a web site. legal power may lie in all the states where entree to that web site can be obtained’ . Iin sing the above. one must besides take into history the surrogate position in that the planetary growing of the cyberspace should non be used a s a shield for on-line publishing houses to avoid the basic rule that an person has the right to keep their repute in their place legal power. The fact that the cyberspace is planetary does non and should non intend that publishing houses can conceal behind this globalization as a manner of avoiding action for calumniatory publications. This will necessitate peculiar consideration for states such as the US. with its broad application of free address. in regard of calumny instances and whether they will implement opinions of international legal powers. A claim of calumny is contrast in that it seeks to protect the repute of persons and administrations nevertheless this would look to suppress the right to freedom of address. As celebrated above freedom of address is a cardinal right embodied in the US through its Constitution. As such. the US is less rigorous on verbal calumny that most other legal powers. Whilst it is good to hold clear and concise regulations in Australia about when and where a calumny instance affecting a publication is heard in Australia which amendss an Australian repute. where those publications are made outside of Australia. if a opinion can non be enforced in legal powers such as the US. the Australian regulations will make little to advance justness in the eyes of complainant Australians who suffer such international defamatory Acts of the Apostless. A farther complication to the manner the US considered affairs of legal power is the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment in the Constitution. As is the instance in Australia. the get downing point for the US in finding affairs of legal powers starts with a party’s presence in the forum. The US Courts so determine whether the cause of action asserts general legal power. where a party lives in the relevant legal power or carries out a big figure of activities at that place. or specific legal power where there must be a high sum of contact between relevant forum and a suspect who does non shack in the legal power. Other determinations in the US have reflected a different attack to legal power in finding that ‘a complainant would necessitate to turn out than an out of province defendant’s cyberspace activity was expressly targeted at. or directed to. the forum province in order to set up legal power in the tribunals of that state’ . The instance of Stanley K. Young v New Haven Advocate ( 2002 ) 315 F. 3d 256 supported this individual publication attack which focuses on the topographic point of upload of a publication in finding legal power by finding that the on-line newspaper had intended to direct the publication at a specific audience ( in this instance Connecticut ) being the same topographic point as the topographic point of upload of the article. even though the article was available in other legal powers given its on-line nature. When sing affairs of legal power and forum and whether the traditional regulations of legal power can be applied to online calumny. the Australian trial of forum non conveniens. where a tribunal is persuaded that another forum or legal power is better placed to hear a affair. is in contrast to the US Courts who look at the possible unfairness against a party holding to support a instance in a foreign legal power. In order to fulfill the forum non conveniens test one must fulfill themselves whether the legal power that is under onslaught is ‘a clearly inappropriate forum’ . In Dow Jones. Dow Jones themselves argued that supporting a claim of calumny in Australia would be burdensome due to the fact that naming informants. bring forthing paperss and accessing stuff would be that much more hard. In support of this. Dow Jones suggested that Gutnick would non be faced with these troubles as the grounds would be readily available in the US. Ultimately. the forum non conveniens trial was rejected by Hedigan J who stated ‘the failing in the statements [ of Dow Jones ] is that the aspect sued on by Mr Gutnick is indelibly Victorian. connected with no other topographic point and that nay certification or grounds refering the affair will wholly be found in Victoria’ . A figure of US instances sing legal power have been determined based on the defendant’s operation of a web site that was deemed accessible in the relevant forum and which caused injury to the complainant in such forum. This US attack is consistent with the Australia attack which revolves around the topographic point of entree of an on-line publication. Alternatively. some US Courts have rejected the above position on legal power in favor of an attack where more grounds is required that a suspect who publishes material online must hold published it with the purpose to aim people who reside in a specific forum for the stuff posted online to be calumniatory. DecisionThe opinion given by Hedigan J has set a case in point for on-line publications. Any on-line publishing house must now be cognizant that they might non merely be capable to the calumny Torahs of the legal power where the physical computing machine on which the publication was uploaded but besides to the Torahs of other states where the publication can be accessed. It is evident from reappraisal of the assorted instances that the topographic point of publication is at the very bosom of finding a class of action for calumny. Therefore. publication in the legal power of the tribunal is in fact irrelevant. By the really significance of calumny on the cyberspace. stuff can merely be considered published at the topographic point where it is read. heard or seen as opposed to the topographic point from where the stuff originates. To spread out this definition. a separate publication and new cause of action occurs each clip the stuff is read. heard or seen which furnished the footing for legal power to all topographic points in the universe because of modern twenty-four hours publication to a planetary audience through the cyberspace. It is evident that with the growing of the cyberspace comes growing of cyberspace publications and with such growing differences sing legal power for on-line calumny will go more common topographic point. It is for this really ground that it is imperative that legal powers form a concrete footing in how to find affairs of legal power. It appears that whilst Dow Jones has helped Australia develop a common pattern in finding legal power based on the topographic point of injury cause and non the topographic point of publication. the constitutional right of free address in the US is invariably combating the right to protect 1s repute. As much of the population of the US believes freedom of address to be the most cardinal of all constitutional rights this position does non adequately represent the beliefs of an of all time increasing multicultural cyberspace user base. Alternatively. some may reason that as the Torahs regulating calumny in Australia differ from province to province this deficiency of uniformity has besides spread internationally. Given that the US appears to hold the least rigorous Torahs on legal power given their application of freedom of address it is my position that Australia has one of most appropriate and effectual trials for finding legal power and 1 that will stand the trial of clip as the usage of the cyberspace grows. specifically in footings of on-line publications. In bend Australia is now favoring towards exerting legal power in cyberspace based instances. The instance of Dow Jones has set a precedent nationwide on how to use legal power when covering with on-line publications. Therefore. while the impression of free address has non disappeared everlastingly. the power of the cyberspace and a simple Google hunt from anyplace in the universe should do anyone believe twice approximately posting what may be considered a harmless article from the other side of the universe. If there is one piece of advice a reader can take from this it would be to be wary. The cyberspace can be a unsafe forum when used unsuitably. Once something is published it is stored in the universe broad web for life as on the cyberspace. ‘a calumniatory statement can be outright available throughout the world’ .